Key result
The DECISION QFR trial is designed to evaluate the agreement between Heart Team revascularization recommendations based on QFR versus FFR in patients with multivessel disease.
Why the study?
Functional lesion information improves SYNTAX score prognostication in multivessel disease, but whether angiography-derived QFR can feasibly replace wire-based FFR in Heart Team decision-making remains unproven.
Does QFR-based patient information provide acceptable agreement with FFR-based information for Heart Team revascularization recommendations in patients with multivessel disease?
RCT (n=260)
randomized
Yes
Does QFR-based patient information provide acceptable agreement with FFR-based information for Heart Team revascularization recommendations in patients with multivessel disease?
The DECISION QFR trial will determine if angiography-derived QFR can reliably replace invasive FFR for Heart Team decision-making in multivessel coronary disease.
QFR should not yet guide Heart Team decisions in multivessel disease; DECISION QFR will establish agreement with FFR.
In patients with multivessel disease (MVD), functional information on lesions improves the prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR®) is an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) that does not require a pressure wire or pharmacological hyperemia. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of QFR-based patient information in Heart Teams' discussions to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with MVD. We hypothesized that there is an acceptable agreement between treatment recommendations based on the QFR approach and recommendation based on the FFR approach. The DECISION QFR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will include patients with MVD who require revascularization. Two Heart Teams comprising cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be randomized to select a revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft) according to patient information either based on QFR or on FFR. All 260 patients will be assessed by both teams with reference to the anatomical and functional SYNTAX score/SYNTAX score II 2020 derived from the allocated physiological index (QFR or FFR). The primary endpoint of the trial is the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams, assessed using Cohen's κ. As of March 2022, the patient enrollment has been completed and 230 patients have been discussed in both Heart Teams. The current trial will indicate the usefulness of QFR, which enables a wireless multivessel physiological interrogation, in the discussions of Heart Teams to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for MVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyata et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Multivessel disease (n=260). Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) vs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was evaluated on Level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams, assessed using Cohen's κ. The DECISION QFR trial is designed to evaluate the agreement between Heart Team revascularization recommendations based on QFR versus FFR in patients with multivessel disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: