Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the tri-objective optimization of underground metro station structures, considering structural reliability, life-cycle economic cost, and annualized carbon emissions simultaneously. Using a representative metro station in Guangzhou as a case study, a multi-objective optimization framework is developed. The model defines structural failure probability, discounted life-cycle cost, and average annual carbon emissions as the primary objectives, with decision variables including concrete strength, cover thickness, the use of epoxy-coated reinforcement, and various maintenance/repair strategies. Material quantities are calculated through Building Information Modeling (BIM), while cost–carbon relationships are derived from industry price data and carbon emission factors. An improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm (OMOPSO) is used to derive the Pareto-optimal front. Case study results show that increasing cover thickness significantly improves durability and reduces carbon emissions with only moderate cost increases. In contrast, epoxy-coated reinforcement is excluded from the Pareto set due to its high cost under the given conditions. To facilitate practical decision-making, a weight-based solution selection method is introduced, and sensitivity analyses are performed to assess the model’s robustness. The study concludes by emphasizing the framework’s applicability and limitations: the findings are specific to the case context and require recalibration for use in other sites or construction practices. This research contributes by integrating durability, cost, and carbon considerations into an engineering-level optimization workflow, providing valuable decision support for sustainable metro station design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: