Key result
Regular physical activity was not associated with a significant increase in sinus of Valsalva diameter progression (13% vs 8%, p=0.45) compared to a sedentary lifestyle in pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve over 2 years.
Why the study?
Patients with bicuspid aortic valve have an increased risk of aortic dilation and dissection, but the impact of physical training on aortopathy progression remains unclear.
Does regular physical activity increase aortic diameter progression in pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve?
Cohort (n=90)
No
Does regular physical activity increase aortic diameter progression in pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve?
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 8%
p-value: p=0.45
Regular physical activity is not associated with an increased risk of aortic diameter progression over a 2-year period in pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve.
Reassures on short-term aortic safety of activity in pediatric bicuspid aortic valve; leaves open longer-term and larger-scale confirmation.
Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have an increased risk of aortic dilation and aortic dissection or rupture. The impact of physical training on the natural course of aortopathy in BAV patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of regular physical activity on aortic diameters in a consecutive cohort of paediatric patients with BAV. Consecutive paediatric BAV patients were evaluated and categorized into two groups: physically active and sedentary subjects. Only the subjects with a complete 2-year follow-up were included in the study. To evaluate the potential impact of physical activity on aortic size, aortic diameters were measured at the sinus of Valsalva and mid-ascending aorta using echocardiography. We defined aortic diameter progression the increase of aortic diameter ≥ 10% from baseline. Among 90 BAV patients (11.5 ± 3.4 years of age, 77% males), 53 (59%) were physically active subjects. Compared to sedentary, physically active subjects were not significantly more likely to have > 10% increase in sinus of Valsalva (13% vs. 8%, p-value = 0.45) or mid-ascending aorta diameter (9% vs. 13%, p-value = 0.55) at 2 years follow-up, both in subjects with sinus of Valsalva diameter progression (3.7 ± 1.0 mm vs. 3.5 ± 0.8 mm, p-value = 0.67) and in those with ascending aorta diameter progression (3.0 ± 0.8 mm vs. 3.2 ± 1.3 mm, p-value = 0.83). In our paediatric cohort of BAV patients, the prevalence and the degree of aortic diameter progression was not significantly different between physically active and sedentary subjects, suggesting that aortic dilation is unrelated to regular physical activity over a 2-year period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monda et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Bicuspid aortic valve (n=90). Regular physical activity vs. Sedentary lifestyle was evaluated on Aortic diameter progression (increase of sinus of Valsalva diameter ≥ 10% from baseline) (p=0.45). Regular physical activity was not associated with a significant increase in sinus of Valsalva diameter progression (13% vs 8%, p=0.45) compared to a sedentary lifestyle in pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve over 2 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: