Key result
Resting LV structure and function show no association with VO2peak in upper spinal cord injury.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether left ventricular structure and function are associated with cardiorespiratory fitness and fat-free mass in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Cross-Sectional (n=32)
No
In individuals with cervical and upper-thoracic spinal cord injury, resting left ventricular parameters do not correlate with peak cardiorespiratory fitness, though left ventricular mass is strongly associated with fat-free mass.
Resting LV assessment should not guide fitness evaluation in cervical SCI; leaves open non-cardiac determinants of peak VO2.
Study design Cross-sectional. Objective It is known that left ventricular mass (LVM) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are associated to fat-free mass (FFM). It is unknown if these factors associated with left ventricular (LV) structure and function outcomes in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting University-based laboratory.Vancouver, BC, Canada. Methods Thirty-two individuals (aged 40 ± 11 years) with chronic, motor-complete SCI between the fourth cervical and sixth thoracic levels were recruited. Echocardiographic LV parameters and body composition were assessed at rest, as per the recommended guidelines for each technique. CRF was assessed during an incremental arm-cycle exercise test until volitional fatigue. The appropriate bivariate correlation coefficients [i.e., Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s rank (Rs)] tests were used for normal and non-normal distributed variables, respectively. Results LV structure and function parameters were not associated with the indexed peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) [i.e., relative to body weight or FFM] (Rs values ranged from −0.168 to 0.134, all P values > 0.223). The association between peak oxygen pulse and the resting echocardiographic-obtained SV was medium sized (Rs = 0.331, P = 0.069). The LVM associations with FFM and fat mass (FM) were large and small (r = 0.614, P < 0.001 and r = 0.266, P = 0.141, respectively). Associations of absolute V̇O2peak were medium- positive with FFM (Rs = 0.414, P = 0.021) but negative with FM (Rs = −0.332, P = 0.068). Conclusion LV parameters measured at rest are not associated with V̇O2peak in individuals with cervical and upper-thoracic SCI. Given the observed associations between LVM and V̇O2peak with FFM, future studies may consider utilizing FFM for indexing cardiovascular measures following SCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alrashidi et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic, motor-complete cervical and upper-thoracic spinal cord injury (n=32). Cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition was evaluated on Association between resting left ventricular structure and function parameters and indexed peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) (Rs -0.168 to 0.134, p=>0.223). Resting left ventricular structure and function parameters were not significantly associated with indexed peak oxygen consumption in individuals with cervical and upper-thoracic spinal cord injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: