Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enantioseparations of (R/S)-α-cyclohexylmandelic acid [(R/S)-CHMA] and methyl (R/S)-α-cyclohexylmandelate [(R/S)-MCHMA] were performed on an achiral column (ODS) with 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) as a chiral mobile phase additive. The influences of chromatographic conditions on the retention behavior of (R/S)-CHMA and (R/S)-MCHMA were studied in detail. Meanwhile, the thermodynamics parameters of enantioseparations for (R/S)-CHMA and (R/S)-MCHMA were determined to discuss driven power in the enantioseparation process. The inclusion complexation of HP-β-CD with each enantiomer for (R/S)-CHMA and (R/S)-MCHMA was simulated by molecular docking to understand the chiral recognition mechanism of (R/S)-CHMA and (R/S)-MCHMA on HP-β-CD. The results showed that the chiral recognition ability of enantiometers of (R/S)-CHMA and (R/S)-MCHMA on HP-β-CD is better than α-CD, β-CD, γ-CD and DM-β-CD. Under the selected chromatographic conditions, baseline separations of enantiomers of (R/S)-CHMA and (R/S)-MCHMA were achieved. It is proved that the stoichiometry for (R/S)-CHMA-HP-β-CD and (R/S)-MCHMA-HP-β-CD complexes is 1:1. However, the results of thermodynamics parameters analysis and molecular modeling show that the enantioseparations of CHMA and MCHMA on HP-β-CD are enthalpy-driven processes and the primary driving forces responsible for chiral recognition are hydrophobic forces, dipole-dipole interaction, charge-transfer and hydrophobic interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: