This article considers spline smoothing of variance functions. We focus on selection of the smoothing parameters and develop three direct data-driven methods: unbiased risk (UBR), generalized approximate cross-validation (GACV), and generalized maximum likelihood (GML). In addition to guaranteed convergence, simulations show that these direct methods perform better than existing indirect UBR, generalized cross-validation (GCV), and GML methods. The direct UBR and GML methods perform better than the GACV method. An application to array-based comparative genomic hybridization data illustrates the usefulness of the proposed methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: