The crystal and molecular structures of the chloroacetato complexes of gadolinium(III), erbium(III), and ytterbium(III) indicated in the title were determined by the single-crystal X-ray diffraction method. In addition to these three complexes, the isomorphous dysprosium(III) salt was also obtained. Their chemical composition, M3L9·5H2O (where M=Gd, Dy, Er, or Yb; HL=chloroacetic acid), is the same as that of the light lanthanoid(III) (La–Eu) chloroacetates, though the latter crystals are monoclinic. The cell constants of the ytterbium(III) salt, for example, are: triclinic, space group P1, a=13.278(10), b=13.624(6), c=12.067(4) Å α=96.62(3), β=100.68(5), γ=67.40(4)°, Z=2 (including 6 metal atoms). There are three kinds of crystallographically independent metal atoms; Yb(1), Yb(2), and Yb(3): Yb(1) and Yb(2) are octa-coordinated (square-antiprism geometry) and Yb(3) is ennea-coordinated (monocapped square-antiprism geometry). Two oxygen atoms around the last type of the metal atom are the more separated in the higher atomic-number lanthanoid(III) complex, while the other M–O bond lengths decrease, depending on the increase of the metal atomic number. The metal atoms are bridged by carboxylate ions in a chair form along the [111] axis, though in a way different from that of the light lanthanoid(III) complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugita et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: