Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To investigate the three-dimensional (3D) structure of nanoparticle (NP) aggregates in rubber tire treads with a large system size, a particle-mesh-based two-dimensional (2D) pattern reverse Monte Carlo (PM-2DpRMC) method was applied to a series of 2D scattering patterns (2DSPs) of NPs during stretching and unloading. To characterize the structures of aggregated NPs, a high-connectivity cluster analysis based on the number of NPs within a specific cutoff distance was introduced. Similar to the reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) analysis of a one-dimensional scattering spectrum, PM-2DpRMC analysis for the case before stretching clarified that the characteristic cluster sizes of silica NPs in end-modified styrene–butadiene rubber (M-SBR) treads were smaller than those in nonmodified SBR (n-SBR) treads. Changes in the 3D configurations of NPs during stretching were modeled from a series of 2DSPs of NPs by repeating the stepwise deformation of the box of the periodic boundary condition, and this method was termed the “on-the-fly PM-2DpRMC” method. The high-connectivity cluster analysis elucidated that the NPs in the M-SBR treads aggregated more at higher elongation ratios (ε); however, the characteristic sizes of the NP aggregates in the n-SBR treads were slightly small at higher ε values. At a high ε of >140%, although the number of clusters in the M-SBR treads became close to those in the n-SBR treads, the difference between the characteristic sizes of NP aggregates was retained. Furthermore, the high-connectivity cluster analysis was mathematically more sensitive for the characterization of NP morphologies than a previously reported analysis based on the Voronoi cell volume. The high-connectivity cluster analysis helps clarify the justification of the on-the-fly PM-2DpRMC method and its numerical comparison with the PM-2DpRMC analysis starting from random NP configurations. Moreover, the results of this study elucidate the importance of a lower scattering wavenumber, q, limit in the modeling of NP aggregation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagita et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: