BACKGROUND: The increasing importance of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) for the assessment of ovarian reserve requires accurate AMH measurements. There have been conflicting results about the reliability of currently existing manual AMH assays. METHODS: Development of a high sensitive, fast and fully automated AMH assay on the Elecsys®/cobas e electrochemiluminescence immunoassay platform. RESULTS: Elecsys® AMH is a monoclonal two-site assay used to measure AMH in 50 µL of serum or lithium heparin plasma in about 18 min. Its measuring range is from 0.01 to 23 ng/mL. The assay detects primarily 140 kDa total AMH (proAMH and AMHN,C). Standardization was against the Beckman AMH Gen II. Recovery against the highly cited Immunotech calibration was about 90%. Within-run imprecision coefficient of variation (CV) calculated on 10 serum samples were between 0.5% and 1.8%. Repeatability and intermediate precision calculated on 14 serum samples ranged from 2.6% to 1.7% and 2.9% to 2.1%, respectively. Limit of detection (LoD) [limit of quantitation (LoQ)] was 0.01 ng/mL (0.03 ng/mL). Percent recovery in dilution studies was <10% and after mixing of high and low AMH pools 94% to 103%. Elecsys® AMH, when compared to revised AMH Gen II (or Ansh Labs ultrasensitive AMH ELISA) using 57 female serum samples yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.98 (0.97) and a slope of 0.81 (0.73). There was no evidence for sample instability or variability. Samples stored at 20-25 °C or 2-8 °C up to 7 days showed no significant storage issues. Freeze-thaw cycles or sample storage at -20 °C and -80 °C for up to 9 months was without any effect on measured AMH. CONCLUSIONS: Availability of an automated Elecsys® AMH assay offers an attractive alternative to the current manual AMH assays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gassner et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: