Background Accurate assessment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity remains challenging. Blood-based biomarkers, including Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), have emerged as potential tools for refining TBI classification. This study investigated differences in serum UCH-L1 and GFAP between mild and moderate-to-severe head injuries, and their predictive value for injury severity. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. M. Djamil General Central Hospital, Padang, Indonesia (March–August 2024), enrolling 98 patients aged >18 years with TBI onset within 48 hours. Serum levels were measured via ELISA, and severity was classified using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Group differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and discriminatory performance was assessed via Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results Serum UCH-L1 was significantly higher in moderate-to-severe (median 6364.5 ng/mL) than mild injuries (median 5684.5 ng/mL, P<0.05), with an optimal cut-off of 6085.5 ng/mL (60.5% sensitivity, 61.7% specificity). GFAP showed no significant difference (P>0.05); its cut-off was 2.17 ng/mL (63.2% sensitivity, 65.0% specificity). UCH-L1 yielded an AUC of 61.2% (95% CI 49.4–73.0%) and GFAP an AUC of 62.1% (95% CI 50.6–73.7%), both indicating poor-to-fair discrimination, overlapping confidence intervals indicate no meaningful difference between the two biomarkers. Conclusions Serum UCH-L1 and GFAP show potential diagnostic value for TBI severity. UCH-L1 significantly differentiated severity levels, while GFAP did not reach significance. Both biomarkers may serve as adjuncts to GCS scoring in acute TBI management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susanti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: