Key result
Annual minimally invasive mitral valve volumes exceeding ~60 cases are linked to improved long-term survival.
Why the study?
Outcomes after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery likely depend on expertise, but definitions of a high-volume centre vary and lack evidence-based substantiation.
Does higher surgical volume improve outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=23,495)
Yes
Does higher surgical volume improve outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
A threshold of 53 to 60 cases per year defines a high-volume centre for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, which is associated with improved repair rates, long-term survival, and freedom from reoperation.
Supports referral to centers exceeding 53-60 annual cases; extends observational volume-outcome data but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is increasingly performed, but outcomes such as repair rate, mortality and survival likely depend on expertise. Still, the definition of a high-volume centre varies in the literature and lacks an evidence-based substantiation. Consequently, this study aims to determine the volume-outcome relation in MIMVS in conjunction with a volume threshold, in order to define 'high-volume centres', applying a novel statistical concept. METHODS: The study was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42022376293, registered 26 November 2022). A systematic search was applied to three databases, including consecutive patients undergoing MIMVS. Studies describing patients undergoing transcatheter procedures were excluded. Restricted cubic spline analyses were applied and the elbow method was used to retrieve the threshold volume. Long-term outcomes were analysed using reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves and a novel statistical concept to assess the volume-outcome relation for time-to-event outcomes was applied. The primary outcome was early mortality, secondary outcomes were repair rate, stroke, and long-term survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from more than moderate mitral regurgitation. Leave-one-out analyses were performed for sensitivity purposes. RESULTS: Data from 68 unique centres were included (n=23 495 patients). Early mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 1.1% to 1.6%), without a statistically significant non-linear relation for this endpoint, nor for stroke. There was a statistically significant volume-outcome relation for mitral valve repair rate (p=0.018). Based on the repair rate, the threshold to define a high-volume centre was 60 cases/year (number needed to treat to prevent a replacement ≤7). A significant volume-outcome relation was observed for long-term outcomes as well, with a threshold of 53 and 54 cases/year for long-term survival and freedom from reoperation, respectively. These results were robust across the sensitivity analyses for the various endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The threshold to define a high-volume centre ranges between 53 and 60 cases/year based on repair rate, long-term survival and freedom-from reoperation. These findings have the potential to facilitate centralisation of MIMVS.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022376293.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hjij et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (n=23,495). High surgical volume vs. Low surgical volume was evaluated on early mortality. A surgical volume threshold of 53 to 60 cases per year for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery was significantly associated with higher repair rates (P=0.018) and improved long-term survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: