The Benford-like behaviour is commonly seen in practical data. That is, the digit frequency more or less has the distribution first introduced by Benford. Despite common belief, however, most datasets do not conform perfectly to Benford's law; they fail famous Benford tests in the literature, or as Nigrini puts it, these tests are too powerful for checking the conformity. We propose a new approach on measuring the deviation of datasets from Benford distribution to determine possible abnormality. We show that the conventional digit frequency tests do not fully absorb the 'significant digit' property. We discuss barriers on the way of auditors in using digit tests mainly when the number of samples is too small or too large. We then propose our method using the logarithmic basis of Benford's law which states the mantissa of the logarithm of all practical numbers should be uniformly distributed. We then test several goodness-of-fit techniques that compare the sample data's mantissa distribution with that of the uniform distribution between zero and one. Our experiment on sample datasets show that Kolmogrov-Smirnov test for uniformity works best for small, medium size and even large records.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazemitabar et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: