Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the time course of the aerobic response to strenuous training in well-conditioned distance runners when intensity was held fairly constant relative to maximal aerobic power, and the effect of this training on 10-km run time. Seven runners trained 6 d/wk for 6 wk. On 3 d/wk they ran as far as possible in 40 min, with the intention of running a greater distance each run. On alternate days the subjects performed five 5-min rides on a cycle ergometer (CE) separated by 5-min intervals of jogging, with the resistance adjusted to induce peak-CE VO2 during minutes 4 and 5 of each ride. Peak-CE VO2 increased (56.1 to 65.0 ml X min-1 X kg-1, P less than 0.05) in a linear manner (r = 0.95, P less than 0.01) during the first 5 wk. The average weekly increase was 0.11 l X min-1. Unexpectedly, peak-CE VO2 decreased significantly after week six. Treadmill VO2max was not significantly different after training. The mean decrease (P less than 0.05) in 10-km run time was approximately 81 S. These data suggest an adaptation of constant magnitude of the factor(s) which limit peak-CE VO2 when training intensity is maintained relative to improvement. However, this linear response and training intensity may be maintained only on a limited basis without expecting some decline in performance and aerobic power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MIKESELL et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: