Key result
Modified Misgav-Ladach cesarean reduces 24-hour IL-6 elevation by ~63% versus Pfannenstiel-Kerr.
Why the study?
Does the modified Misgav-Ladach technique reduce inflammatory reactions compared to the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section?
RCT (n=81)
Computer-generated random numbers
No
Does the modified Misgav-Ladach technique reduce inflammatory reactions compared to the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section?
The modified Misgav-Ladach cesarean section technique is associated with a shorter operation time and differences in inflammatory marker changes compared to the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique.
First RCT comparing inflammatory responses after modified Misgav-Ladach versus Pfannenstiel-Kerr cesarean sections; leaves open optimal technique for minimizing postoperative inflammation.
Objectives: There is not yet a consensus on the optimal surgical technique for cesarean section. This is the first study comparing two different (Cesarean Section) with respect to the following inflammatory reaction in means of changes in inflammatory marker levels.To evaluate the differences in inflammatory reactions following two different (Cesarean Section) techniques, the modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique.Study Desıgn: The study population included 88 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria. These women were randomized into two groups according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines: Group 1 (Misgav-Ladach group) and Group 2 (Pfannenstiel Kerr group). To compare the inflammatory reactions following surgery, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) levels were measured in venous blood samples drawn from the patients just before (0 hour) and 24 hours (24th hour) after the surgery. In 5 women from Group 1 and 2 women from Group 2, the 24th hour blood samples could not be obtained or were lost. Thus, a total of 81 women, 39 women from Group 1 and 42 women from Group 2, comprised the population of study. The differences in inflammatory reactions between the 0 and 24th hours were analyzed by calculating the percent change in IL-6 and TNF-α levels, and these percentages were then compared between the groups.Results: There was a statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding the serum IL-6 level change between 0 and 24th hour (530±653% and 196±168%, respectively, p=0.022. The difference in TNF-α was also higher in Group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (229±306% vs. 571±824%, p=0.12). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in Group 1 (9.44 min. vs. 16.86 min, p=0.0001).Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the modified Misgav-Ladach technique has a weaker inflammatory reaction, which indicates fewer short- and long-term surgical complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Büke et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Elective cesarean section (n=81). Modified Misgav-Ladach technique vs. Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique was evaluated on Percent change in serum IL-6 level between 0 and 24 hours (p=0.022). The modified Misgav-Ladach cesarean section technique resulted in a significantly lower increase in serum IL-6 levels at 24 hours compared to the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique (196% vs. 530%, p=0.022).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: