Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Weight-for-height standards in children are usually constructed on the basis that the expected weight for a given height does not depend on age, an assumption which is unjustified. Analysis of data from a Shiraz (Iran) growth study confirms the need to take age into account when assessing weight-for-height of schoolchildren aged 6-12. The method described by Cole in 1979 (Annals of Human Biology, 6, 249-268) leads to errors in the assessment of these children, in particular 6-year-old boys and 10-year-old girls. This paper proposes an alternative, which relies on Z-score of height-for-age (HI) and Z-score of log (weight)-for-age (WI). These indices are age- and sex-specific standard scores (Z-scores) derived from modelling height-for-age and weight-for-age smoothed centile curves. The method provides a unified structure of the regression of WI on HI, which overcomes the problem of age dependency in weight-height relationship. Age-adjusted smoothed centiles of weight-for-height are derived at each age of weight and height to their respective Z-scores, and weight-for-height centiles of 1207 Shiraz schoolchildren in a representative sample in a cross-sectional study are drawn for each age-sex category. This Z-score method proves to be simple and stable, and is likely to be useful for any sort of growth data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: