Reactions of the mono-branched tripodal ligand, N-[N′-(carboxymethyl)benzimidazol-2-ylmethyl]-N,N-bis(benzimidazol-2-ylmethyl)amine (HAcNTB), with different Cu2+ salts under varied conditions have resulted in six new Cu2+ coordination assemblies, namely, [Cu6(AcNTB)6](BF4)6·30H2O (1-BF44), [Cu3(AcNTB)3](SiF6)1.5·CH3CN·CH3OH·8H2O (2-SiF66), [Cu(AcNTB)](CH3C6H4SO3)·CH3OH (3-OTs), [Cu(AcNTB)](ClO4)·0.5C6H5NO2·2.5H2O (3-ClO44-PhNO22), [Cu(AcNTB)](NO3)·0.5C6H5NO2·4.25H2O (3-NO33-PhNO22) and [Cu2(AcNTB)2](NO3)2·0.5CH3C6H5·2CH3OH·H2O (3-NO33-MePh). The common feature of these complexes is that, similar chiral [Cu(AcNTB)]+ building blocks are formed with three arms of the tripodal ligand wrapping around the Cu2+ centers in either clockwise (Δ-conformer) or anticlockwise (Λ-conformer) fashion, and such building blocks are further assembled with the carboxylate branch (Ac group) acting as bridge by forming Cu–O coordination bond. As a consequence, the assembly process is controlled by the bridging fashion of Ac group between the [Cu(AcNTB)]+ building blocks. In complex 1-BF44 three Δ-conformers and three Λ-conformers are alternately connected to form a cyclic meso-hexamer, in complex 2-SiF66 three Δ-conformers (or three Λ-conformers) are connected to form discrete chiral-trimers (ΔΔΔ-trimer or ΛΛΛ-trimer), while in complexes 3-OTs, 3-ClO44-PhNO22, 3-NO33-PhNO22 and 3-NO33-MePh the same handed conformers are connected into one-dimensional (1D) chiral-chains (ΔΔΔ-chain or ΛΛΛ-chain). Structural analyses disclose that the assembly fashion and chirality transfer in theses complexes are modulated by the supramolecular interactions including N–H⋯F hydrogen bonds, intra- and inter-molecular π–π interactions which are directed by the counter anions as well as additional aromatic molecules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: