This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
To compare the level of physical activity (PA) measured by self-reported questionnaire and pedometer in 12-year-old Vietnamese adolescents. Data was collected from March to May 2023 in two phases among 510 sixth-grade students in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The first phase involved a pilot study, which recruited 35 students from a randomly selected class to evaluate the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) test-retest reliability. PA was measured twice, with seven-day intervals between assessments. The second phase was a cross-sectional study including 475 sixth-grade students to evaluate the agreement between PAQ-C scores and pedometer data. Participants wore a pedometer continuously for seven days and completed the PAQ-C at the end of the monitoring period. Sociodemographic and anthropometric data were collected. The sample of 35 students showed that PAQ-C demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.89) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.82). After one week, McNemar's test indicated no significant difference in activity levels between the baseline and second assessment. In the sample of 475 students, there was a substantial agreement between PAQ-C and pedometer in classifying physical activity levels (Cohen's κ = 0.688, p < 0.001), with a strong correlation between daily step counts and PAQ-C scores (rs = 0.855, p < 0.001). PAQ-C is a reliable, cost-effective tool for school-based PA monitoring in 12-year-old Vietnamese adolescents, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: