Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We use weighted mean and median statistics techniques to combine individual estimates of Ω M,0 , the present mean mass density in nonrelativistic matter, and determine the observed values and ranges of Ω M,0 from different combinations of data. The derived weighted mean Ω M,0 values are not good representatives of the individual measurements, under the assumptions of Gaussianity and negligible correlation between the individual measurements. This could mean that some observational error bars are underestimated. Discarding the most discrepant ∼5% of the measurements generally alleviates but does not completely resolve this problem. While the results derived from the different combinations of data are not identical, they are mostly consistent, and a reasonable summary of the median statistics analyses is 0.2≲Ω M,0 ≲0.35 at 2 standard deviations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2003 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: