In this note, we discuss k-factor, second order designs with minimum number of points ½(k + l)(k + 2), in particular, those which are extensions of designs that give minimum generalized variance for k = 2 and 3. The experimental region is the unit cuboid. Minimum point designs of this type are unknown for k ≥ 4, and these designs are the best found to date except for k = 4, where a better design is known. Kiefer has shown that these designs cannot be the best for k ≥ 7, via an existence result but, even here, specific better designs are not known and appear difficult to obtain. We also discuss some difficulties of using, in practice, designs that, are D-optimal (that is give minimum generalized variance when the number of points is not restricted).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Box et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: