Acute cholangitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic drainage procedures have been shown to be a safe and effective mode of treatment in acute cholangitis. As there is paucity of large series on endoscopic management of acute cholangitis, a study was performed to evaluate safety and efficiency of endoscopic biliary decompression in acute cholangitis. The study included 89 consecutive patients (mean age 55+/-15 years; range 35-70 years; 50 males) with acute cholangitis requiring biliary drainage. Main presenting features were upper abdominal pain (84%), fever with chills (90%) and jaundice (74%). Altered sensorium, hypotension, features of peritonitis and acute renal failure were present in 15, 11, 18 and 5%, respectively. Endoscopic procedures performed were endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) with stone extraction (n=40); ES with endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD; n=30); ENBD without ES (n=8); and ES with stent placement (n=11). Of the 89 patients, 85 (95%) responded within 48-72 h. Endoscopic common duct clearance could be achieved in 58 of 78 (74%) patients, whereas in 11 patients undergoing stent placement, stone extraction was not attempted. Complications included post-sphincterotomy bleed (n=2), retroduodenal perforation (n=1) and acute pancreatitis (n=1) with an overall complication rate of 4.4%. All the complications were seen in patients undergoing ES with stone extraction. Mortality was 3.3%. In conclusion, endoscopic biliary drainage is a safe and effective mode of treatment for acute cholangitis. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage or stent placement is safer than ES in acute cholangitis as an initial step.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SHARMA et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: