The equivalence of a popular Austin Maze path and an alternate mirror reflection was examined in a sample of 44 university students (22 male, 22 female) under a counterbalanced latin square design. While all subjects performed better on the pathway administered second, the two paths were equivalent in difficulty. There was also evidence of a sex difference favouring the males. Correlation coefficients indicated that the Maze displayed alternate-form reliability equal to or better than other popular clinical tests of such learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen C. Bowden (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: