Key result
Remdesivir shows potent in vitro activity against tick-borne encephalitis virus with a ~79-fold lower EC50 than sofosbuvir.
Why the study?
Because no antiviral therapy is approved for tick-borne encephalitis and breakthrough infections occur despite vaccines, the study evaluated remdesivir and sofosbuvir for drug repurposing.
Does remdesivir inhibit tick-borne encephalitis virus in vitro?
Does remdesivir inhibit tick-borne encephalitis virus in vitro?
Remdesivir exhibits potent in vitro antiviral activity against tick-borne encephalitis virus by targeting the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, supporting its further evaluation as a potential treatment.
Background Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a neurological disease caused by the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). Despite available vaccines, breakthrough infections occur, some fatal.Objectives As no antiviral therapy for TBE is currently approved, this study evaluated the in vitro activity of already licenced remdesivir (RDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) for possible drug repurposing against TBEV.Methods TBEV was cultured in A549 cells, and the inhibitory effects of RDV (GS-5734), its parent nucleotide GS-441524, and SOF (GS-7977) were assessed.Results After 78 h, RDV demonstrated significantly lower EC50 values than SOF (0.14 vs. 11 µM) based on TBEV RNA levels measured by RT-qPCR. RDV also had a lower mean EC50 (0.55 µM) compared to GS-441524 and SOF (>8.9 and 13.1 µM, respectively) using crystal violet staining after 5 days. After 11 passages of TBEV in the presence of RDV, emergence of virus with a higher EC50 (1.32 vs. 0.55 µM) was detected with two mutations (L3122F and Y3278F) in NS5, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and one substitution in envelope (E) protein (E402G). Similarly, SOF resistance appeared after 20 passages, increasing EC50 values (35.5 vs. 10 µM).Conclusion RDV exhibits potent in vitro antiviral activity against TBEV via specific targeting of the viral RdRp as confirmed by the emergence of resistance-associated double NS5 substitutions in vitro in the presence of RDV. While the potential in vivo implications of the observed RDV resistance remain to be determined, these in vitro data support further assessment of RDV for the treatment of TBEV infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nystrôm et al. (2025) studied Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE). Remdesivir vs. Sofosbuvir was evaluated on EC50 values based on TBEV RNA levels measured by RT-qPCR. Remdesivir demonstrated potent in vitro antiviral activity against tick-borne encephalitis virus with a lower EC50 than sofosbuvir (0.14 vs. 11 µM).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: