Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals that mature VEGF-D promotes angiogenesis and endothelial survival through neuropilin-2 and stanniocalcin-1 upregulation, highlighting targets for cardiovascular therapies.
OBJECTIVE: The mature form of human vascular endothelial growth factor-D (hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC)) is an efficient angiogenic factor, but its full mechanism of action has remained unclear. We studied the effects of hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC) in endothelial cells using gene array, signaling, cell culture, and in vivo gene transfer techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: Concomitant with the angiogenic and proliferative responses, hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC) enhanced the phosphorylation of VEGF receptor-2, Akt, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Gene arrays, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and Western blot revealed increases in VEGF-A, stanniocalcin-1 (STC1), and neuropilin (NRP) 2 expression by hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC) stimulation, whereas induction with hVEGF-A(165) altered the expression of STC1 and NRP1, another coreceptor for VEGFs. The effects of hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC) were seen only under high-serum conditions, whereas for hVEGF-A(165), the strongest response was observed under low-serum conditions. The hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC)-induced upregulation of STC1 and NRP2 was also evident in vivo in mouse skeletal muscle treated with hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC) by adenoviral gene delivery. The importance of NRP2 in hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC) signaling was further studied with NRP2 small interfering RNA and NRP antagonist, which were able to block hVEGF-D(ΔNΔC)-induced survival of endothelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the importance of serum and upregulation of NRP2 and STC1 for VEGF-D(ΔNΔC) effects were demonstrated. Better knowledge of VEGF-D(ΔNΔC) signaling and regulation is valuable for the development of efficient and safe VEGF-D(ΔNΔC)-based therapeutic applications for cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jauhiainen et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: