Key result
Abdominal volume index effectively predicts MetS in both men and women.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the relationship between two hip circumference-based obesity scales (AVI and BAI) and metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance risk scales as predictors of these alterations.
Do Abdominal Volume Index (AVI) and Body Adiposity Index (BAI) predict metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in adult workers?
Cross-Sectional (n=193,462)
Yes
Do Abdominal Volume Index (AVI) and Body Adiposity Index (BAI) predict metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in adult workers?
AVI and BAI are useful anthropometric indices for predicting metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, with higher predictive value observed in women.
Introduction, objectives: Obesity is a global health problem with a great negative impact on health. Among the pathologies caused by obesity are insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, which constitute an increasingly common health problem in both developed and developing countries. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between two scales that assess obesity-based on hip circumference-and metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance risk scales as predictors of these alterations. MATERIALS, METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out on 193,462 workers from different Spanish regions and work groups between January 2019 and September 2021. Abdominal volume index (AVI) and body adiposity index (BAI) were evaluated to assess obesity and its association with insulin resistance using three risk scales (TyG index, Triglycerides/HDL, and METS-IR), while their association with metabolic syndrome was determined using the NCEP ATP III, IDF, and JIS models. RESULTS: The results of the ROC curves to determine the predictive value of BAI and AVI in relation to the three criteria evaluated to calculate MetS in all instances presented a higher area under the curve (AUC) for AVI. The high values of AVI stand out for predicting MetS when applying the IDF criteria. The cut-off point in women was 13.70 with a Youden index of 0.802, whereas in men, the cut-off point was set at 17.59 with a Youden index of 0.672. Regarding the relationship of BAI and AVI with insulin resistance risk scales for both sexes, the AUC only revealed high values when using the METS-IR formula for both AVI and BAI. The AVI cut-off points to predict high values of insulin resistance risk scales in women were established at 13.12 with a Youden index of 0.722. In men, the cut-off point was 17.59, with a Youden index of 0.626. The BAI cut-off points in women were set at 33.88 with a Youden index of 0.748. In men, the cut-off point was 27.91, with a Youden index of 0.598. CONCLUSIONS: AVI demonstrated its value as a predictor of metabolic syndrome while exclusively applying the IDF criteria. AVI and BAI demonstrated their value as predictors of high values of insulin resistance risk scales only in the case of METS-IR. This predictive value is also higher in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramírez‐Manent et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome (n=193,462). Abdominal volume index (AVI) and body adiposity index (BAI) was evaluated on Predictive value for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance risk scales. Abdominal volume index predicted metabolic syndrome using IDF criteria, with a Youden index of 0.802 at a cut-off of 13.70 in women, and 0.672 at a cut-off of 17.59 in men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: