Non-Invasive Laser Modalities in Treatment of Posterior Ventral Infarction

Q: What is the clinical evidence from this study?

Study design: Case Report. Population: Pulmonary hamartoma (n=1). Intervention: Surgical resection. Primary outcome: Clinical recovery.

Q: What does this research mean for the field?

Surgical resection of a 1134 g pulmonary hamartoma resulted in an uneventful recovery, with the patient remaining well at six months postoperatively. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

Pollock Jackson S; Luxemburg Rosa Q; Poirot Hercule; Engels Friedrich

doi:10.36959/582/420

February 3, 2020Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery and TherapeuticsOpen Access

Non-Invasive Laser Modalities in Treatment of Posterior Ventral Infarction

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Study Design

Type

Case Report (n=1)

PICO

P

Population

A single patient who underwent surgical resection of a giant pulmonary hamartoma and was followed for 6 months.

I

Intervention / Comparator

Surgical resection

O

Primary Outcome

Clinical recovery

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

S et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Pulmonary hamartoma (n=1). Surgical resection was evaluated on Clinical recovery.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa78a4b556656019c96e6d5 https://doi.org/10.36959/582/420

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Non-Invasive Laser Modalities in Treatment of Posterior Ventral Infarction

Study Design

PICO

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Non-Invasive Laser Modalities in Treatment of Posterior Ventral Infarction

Study Design

PICO

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading