Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The low use efficiency of nitrogen (N) in rice production attributes to N losses and environmental pollution. One of the ways to improve N use efficiency is by using controlled-release urea (CRU). Field experiments in consecutive three years were conducted to compare the effects of six different types of CRU fertilizers on yield and N accumulation in straw and grain of rice. The special purpose was to provide information for application of CRU in rice. For three seasons, CRU-treated plants had significantly greater grain yields than conventional urea-treated (total N as basal fertilizers, Nt) plants. The greatest grain yields were obtained from CRU-3, CRU-4, and CRU-3 treatment in 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. The N accumulation in rice straws and rice grains of the CRU-treated plots was significantly greater than that of the Nt treatment. Compared with that of the Nt treatment, CRU treatments increased the N use efficiency significantly, although there were differences among the six types of CRU fertilizers. It can be inferred that CRU performed significantly better than conventional urea. Generally, CRU-3 and CRU-6 were the best CRU fertilizers used in rice production in Jianghan Plain, China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: