Key result
Type D personality linked to ~70% higher odds of low socioeconomic status and adverse health outcomes.
Why the study?
Does Type D personality explain socioeconomic health inequalities in the general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=12,090)
Does Type D personality explain socioeconomic health inequalities in the general population?
Odds Ratio: 1.7 (95% CI 1.5–2)
p-value: p=<0.05
Type D personality does not fully explain socioeconomic health inequalities but acts as an additional independent risk factor for adverse health outcomes in the general population.
Associations suggest compounded risks but should not alter practice; leaves open causal mechanisms and intervention targets.
BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, as in many European countries, inequalities in health exist between people with a high and a low socioeconomic status (SES). From the perspective of the 'indirect selection hypothesis', this study was designed to expand our understanding of the role of Type D personality as an explanation of health inequalities. METHODS: Data came from two cross-sectional Dutch surveys among the general population (aged between 19 and 64 years, response 53.7%, n = 12,090). We analyzed the relative risks of low SES, assessed using education and income, and Type D personality, assessed using the Type D Scale-14 (DS14), for different outcomes regarding lifestyle-related risk factors and health, using multivariate Generalized Linear Models. RESULTS: Results showed that Type D personality was significantly associated with low SES (OR = 1.7 for both low education and low income). Moreover, the relative risks of Type D personality and low SES were significantly elevated for most adverse health outcomes, unconditionally as well as conditionally. CONCLUSION: The cross-sectional design hinders the making of definite etiological inferences. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that Type D personality does not explain the socioeconomic health inequalities, but is a risk factor in addition to low SES. Prevention of adverse health outcomes in low SES populations may have more effect when it takes into account that persons with a low SES in combination with a Type D personality are at highest risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bon-Martens et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=12,090). Type D personality vs. Absence of Type D personality was evaluated on Low socioeconomic status (low education) (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5-2.0, p=<0.05). Type D personality was significantly associated with low socioeconomic status (OR 1.7) and both were independently associated with elevated risks for most adverse health outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: