Key result
Preoperative aortic valve calcium score is not linked to 1-month major events after TAVR.
Why the study?
TAVR is still associated with life-threatening cardiovascular outcomes and conductive disturbances, prompting analysis of the prognostic impact of aortic valve calcium score on post-procedure complications.
Does aortic valve calcium score predict death, cardiovascular outcomes, and conductive disturbances after TAVR with new-generation prostheses?
Observational (n=144)
No
Does aortic valve calcium score predict death, cardiovascular outcomes, and conductive disturbances after TAVR with new-generation prostheses?
Absolute Event Rate: 2936% vs 3051%
p-value: p=0.93
Aortic valve calcium score measured by CT does not appear to predict 1-month mortality, cardiovascular events, or conduction disturbances in patients undergoing TAVR with new-generation prostheses.
Should not guide short-term risk stratification after TAVR with new-generation prostheses; leaves open utility for longer-term outcomes or other devices.
Background: The development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has led to an improvement in morbidity–mortality in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients at high surgical risk. However, the procedure is not free from life-threatening cardiovascular outcomes and conductive disturbances. The objective of our study was to analyze the prognostic impact of aortic valve calcium score on the occurrence of complications following the procedure. Materials and Methods: Patients who have benefited from TAVR with the implantation of new-generation Sapien 3 and Evolut R aortic valve prostheses between January 2017 and July 2018 with the prior realization of a cardiac computed tomography with measurement of the aortic valve calcium score were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoint was a composite of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within a period of 1 month after TAVR. Relation between valvular calcium and conductive disturbances was secondarily analyzed over the same period, and occurrences of high-degree atrioventricular block (paroxysmal or permanent), new-onset left bundle branch block, and the need for permanent or transient cardiac stimulation were associated with the secondary endpoint. Results: Overall, 144 patients were included. The aortic valve calcium score was not significantly higher in patients who reached the primary endpoint (2936 ± 1235 vs. 3051 ± 1440, P = 0.93). Among the 106 patients analyzed after excluding subjects with a prior pacemaker or left bundle branch block, aortic valvular calcium score was not statistically associated with the occurrence of conduction disturbances (3210 ± 1436 vs. 2948 ± 1223, P = 0.31). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the measurement of aortic valve calcium score has no prognostic value regarding mortality, cardiovascular events, or conductive disturbances after TAVR using the new generation of valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gamet et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=144). Aortic valve calcium score vs. Patients without primary endpoint was evaluated on Composite of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 1 month after TAVR (p=0.93). Preoperative aortic valve calcium score was not significantly associated with the 1-month composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction after TAVR with new-generation prostheses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: