Key result
Moxonidine reduces sodium retention and cuts energy intake ~10% vs amlodipine in obese hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Does moxonidine improve lipid profile and urinary sodium excretion compared to amlodipine in obese hypertensive patients with Metabolic Syndrome?
RCT (n=27)
randomly assigned
Does moxonidine improve lipid profile and urinary sodium excretion compared to amlodipine in obese hypertensive patients with Metabolic Syndrome?
Moxonidine offers additional metabolic benefits, including reduced caloric intake, waist circumference, and triglycerides, compared to amlodipine in obese hypertensive patients.
Moxonidine may be preferred over amlodipine in obese hypertensives for metabolic effects; extends evidence for sympatholytics beyond BP lowering.
The present study has been conducted to evaluate the chronic effects (7 months) of Moxonidine (M) and Amlodipine (A) on lipid profile and urinary sodium excretion in patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Twenty seven obese hipertensive subjects (BMI = 33 ± 1.0, MBP = 124.6 ± 1.6 mmHg, 4 males, 23 females, age 49.3 ± 1.5 yrs) were randomly assigned to receive M [(n = 17), 49.3 ± 1.9 yrs] or A [(n = 10), 48.3 ± 2.4 yrs]. Both A and M caused significant reduction in systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure (MBP), although no significant difference was observed between the two groups [MBP: M-122.8 ± 1.5 vs 111.2 ± 3.6 mmHg (p = 0.003), A-127.1 ± 2.6 vs 106.0 ± 2.4 (p = 0.0001)]. In conditions of adequate control of sodium and calories intake, the urinary excretion of sodium/creatinine in 12h (NaU) decreased in both groups during blood pressure reduction, but significantly less (p = 0.03) in the M group (21.65 ± 3.992 vs 19.22 ± 2.26 mmol/mmol) when compared to the A group (16.95 ± 2.77 vs 10.92 ± 2.77 mmol/mmol). We observed a significant diminution of energy intake (1987 ± 60, vs 1784 ± 119 calories, p < 0.05), as well as on the waist circumference in the M group (104.4 cm vs 103 cm, p < 0.04), but not in the A group (2229 ± 244 vs 1923 ± 298 calories, p = 0.19 and 100.4 vs 101 cm, p = 0.78). There was a 12% reduction of serum triglycerides concentration with M. Both drugs showed no significant effects on plasma glucose, HDL-C and LDL-C. The administration of M, when compared to A, to obese hypertensive patients reduced the intake of calories, waist circumference and serum triglycerides. Besides having the same antihypertensive efficacy, Moxonidine retained less sodium than Amlodipine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Sanjuliani (2000) conducted an RCT in Obese hypertensive patients with Metabolic Syndrome (n=27). Moxonidine vs. Amlodipine was evaluated on urinary sodium excretion (p=0.03). Moxonidine retained less sodium than amlodipine (p=0.03) and significantly reduced energy intake (1987 vs 1784 calories, p<0.05) and waist circumference in obese hypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: