Key result
Medical and invasive strategies for chronic stable angina target improved outcomes through optimal risk stratification.
This review outlines the medical and invasive treatment options for chronic stable angina, emphasizing the importance of risk stratification for optimal therapeutic choices.
Prioritizes risk stratification to guide stable angina therapy; leaves open optimal medical versus invasive balance in updated trials.
Koroner arter hastalığı tüm dünyada yaygın bir ölüm nedenidir. Kararlı angina pektoris göğüste veya çevresinde efor ile oluşan bir rahatsızlıktır. Bu derleme kronik stabil anjinanın medikal ve invasif tedavi seçeneklerini ve yeni stratejileri ortaya koymayı amaçlamıştır. Tedavinin amacı yaşam kalitesini iyileştirmek, kardiyovasküler olay ve ölümleri azaltmaktır. İdeal tedavi seçiminin belirlenebilmesi için risk derecelendirmesi yapılması gerekir. Bu derecelendirme hiyerarşisi: Klinik değerlendirme, stres testleri, sol ventrikül fonksiyonu ve koroner anjiyografi şeklinde sıralanabilir.Stable angina pectorisCoronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in the world. Stable angina pectoris is a discomfort in the chest or adjacent areas caused by effort. This review will focus on the medical and invasive treatment of chronic stable angina, with a focus in new strategies. The goal of treatment is to improve quality of life, decrease cardiovascular events and mortality. Risk stratification should be made for optimal therapeutic choices. Risk stratification hierarchy can be described as: Clinical evaluation, stres testings, left ventricular function and coronary angiography.J. Exp. Clin. Med., 2012; 29:S117-S121
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korhan Soylu (2013) conducted a review in Stable angina pectoris. Medical and invasive treatments was evaluated. Medical and invasive treatment strategies for chronic stable angina pectoris aim to improve quality of life and decrease cardiovascular events and mortality through optimal risk stratification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: