BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disabling autoimmune disease; unless adequately controlled, patients have a poor long-term prognosis. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists have provided relief for many RA patients; however, despite their efficacy, some patients do not respond or fail to maintain initial response. In the UK, patients with an inadequate response to TNF-alpha antagonists have limited options, as the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) currently only recommend switching to an alternative TNF-alpha antagonists if discontinuation occurs due to safety during the first 6 months of treatment. The EU has approved three biological agents, rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab, for patients with RA with an inadequate response to TNF-alpha antagonists. OBJECTIVE: This review examines the clinical experience with two therapies targeting key immune cells involved in RA -- rituximab (lyses B-cells), and abatacept (T-cell co-stimulation modulator) -- specifically focusing on patients with an inadequate response to TNF-alpha blockade. METHODS: Phase II/III clinical trials and original studies were identified using Medline and Pubmed; articles assessing the efficacy and/or safety of rituximab or abatacept in patients with RA refractory to TNF-alpha blockade were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical data for rituximab and abatacept demonstrate that both reduce disease activity in TNF-alpha antagonist inadequate responders, suggesting that agents with alternative mechanisms of action, such as those targeting key immune cells, may be useful in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John D. Isaacs (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: