Key result
Coupled OpenDiHu-FEBio approach accelerates skeletal muscle electromechanical simulations versus OpenDiHu-OpenDiHu with minimal overhead.
Why the study?
A flexible and efficient coupling of specialized electrophysiology solvers with general finite element mechanics solvers for skeletal muscle simulations was needed to incorporate complex excitation–contraction dynamics and spatial inhomogeneity.
The partitioned coupling approach combining OpenDiHu and FEBio enables faster, flexible, and efficient multi-scale electromechanical simulations of skeletal muscles.
Supports flexible multi-physics muscle simulations; leaves open validation before cardiovascular research adoption.
This work presents a partitioned coupling approach for electromechanical simulations of skeletal muscles. For the first time, we couple our highly specialized electrophysiology solver, which computes both force generation in muscle cells and action potential propagation in muscle fibers, with an external finite element continuum mechanics solver. In particular, we couple an OpenDiHu electrophysiology solver with an FEBio mechanics solver using the coupling library preCICE. Thereby, we present the FEBio adapter and a customized FEBio material, enabling multi‐scale, multi‐physics simulations using a coupled OpenDiHu‐FEBio approach, and incorporating more complex excitation–contraction dynamics and spatial inhomogeneity than in a standard FEBio simulation. We test the OpenDiHu‐FEBio approach on two muscle geometries and compare it to the existing coupled OpenDiHu–OpenDiHu approach, showing that the OpenDiHu–FEBio approach is faster. Besides, we show that preCICE's coupling overhead is small compared to the simulation's total runtime, even when complex, expensive data mapping methods between OpenDiHu and FEBio are used. Using FEBio instead of the OpenDiHu mechanics solver has additional advantages, including support for unstructured grids, multiple well‐established, verified, and tested material models, and an extensive user community. All in all, the implemented OpenDiHu‐FEBio approach shows how we can combine highly application‐specific muscle software with more general tools in a flexible, efficient way, and is a step forward for future development of application‐specific muscle simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Homs-Pons et al. (2026) studied Skeletal muscle electromechanics. OpenDiHu-FEBio approach vs. OpenDiHu-OpenDiHu approach was evaluated on Simulation speed and coupling overhead. The coupled OpenDiHu-FEBio approach for electromechanical simulations of skeletal muscles was faster than the existing OpenDiHu-OpenDiHu approach, with minimal coupling overhead.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: