Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro characterization reveals substituent-tuned electronic coupling and cytotoxicity in dicopper(II) dimers, suggesting potential for targeted metallodrug development.
A series of SNS-supported halide-bridged dicopper(II) dimers [Cu(L)(Br)] 2 were synthesized, where L = 2(C 6 H 5 S)C 6 H 4 N=NC(COCH 3 )-SC 6 H 4 Y (Y = Cl (1), OCH 3 (2), CH 3 (3), F (4), NO 2 (5)), to explore how different substituents affect semi-coordinative Cu···Br interactions and electronic communication in mixed-valence systems. These complexes were characterized using elemental analysis, FTIR, UV–Vis spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, and thermogravimetric analysis. X-ray crystallography of the dimers (1-5) showed distorted square-pyramidal Cu(II) centers connected via μ 2 -bromide bridges, with substituent-dependent differences in Cu···Br semi-coordination. Cyclic voltammetry revealed two quasi-reversible one-electron reductions related to the Cu(II)/Cu(I) and Cu(I)/Cu(I) couples. The redox separation, with the calculated comproportionation constants ranging from 3.44 × 10 2 to 3.70 × 10 4 , and the stability of the mixed-valence state varied systematically with the ligand substituent Y. Correlations among Hammett constants, Cu···Br distances, and electrochemical data demonstrated a clear structure–property relationship. Additionally, these complexes showed DNA-binding activity and moderate anticancer effects against breast (MCF-7), lung (HCT116), and colon (A549) cancer cells, as well as antimicrobial activity against S. aureus , E. coli , K. pneumoniae , and ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae , compared to free ligands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alshammari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: