Administrative data analysis reveals a 12% reduction in unemployment spells among social assistance recipients, indicating evidence against the welfare trap hypothesis.
We develop a framework for estimating a first-exposure effect (FEE) in a social program, defined as the difference between observed use and the counterfactual use absent any learning from first exposure. In administrative data, those never exposed are unobserved, so the counterfactual distribution must be recovered structurally. Under (i) no state dependence in the counterfactual and (ii) behavioural change only at first use, the observed distribution is a one-altered version of the counterfactual. We derive FEE and marginal FEEs for common count processes, provide an R package fee for estimation, and illustrate with Ontario social assistance data. Results show a 12% reduction in unemployment spells due to first exposure, rejecting the welfare trap hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godwin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: