Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study reveals significantly higher multidimensional well-being among irrigated versus rainfed farmers, highlighting the vital role of irrigation access and income stability.
This study assessed and compared the multidimensional well-being of farmers under irrigated and rainfed farming conditions in Karnataka. An ex-post facto research design was adopted in Davanagere and Chitradurga districts during 2023-24. A total of 180 farmers, comprising 90 from irrigated areas and 90 from rainfed areas, were selected through random sampling. Farmers’ well-being was examined across economic, social, family, health, housing, work, social participation, and financial-security dimensions using descriptive statistics, a t-test, and exploratory factor analysis. The overall mean well-being score was higher among irrigated farmers (190.93) than among rainfed farmers (180.98), and the difference was significant at the 1% level (t = 4.14). Exploratory factor analysis identified seven factors: Family and Social Well-being; Financial Security and Social Participation; Market and Irrigation Conditions; Physical Health and Work Conditions; Family Health and Happiness; Social Relationship and Decision-making; and Work Environment and Coping Strategies. Together, these factors explained 45.50% of the total variance. The findings indicate that irrigation access, income stability, family and social conditions, health, work environment, market-related conditions, and coping-related aspects are associated with farmers’ well-being. The study highlights the value of integrated support addressing irrigation, health insurance, education, social participation, extension services, and livelihood diversification for farmers under contrasting farming conditions in Karnataka.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: