Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates efficient one-pot conversion of cellulose to sorbitol using sugarcane hydrochar catalysts, highlighting a circular biorefinery strategy.
Sorbitol is a key biomass-derived platform chemical conventionally produced via glucose hydrogenation. Direct production from cellulose requires integrated hydrolysis and hydrogenation, while valorization of carbonaceous co-products from biomass processing as bifunctional catalyst support remains underexplored. Herein, for the first time, hydrochar co-produced during levulinic acid production from sugarcane leaf (SCL) was reintegrated as a catalyst support for one-pot conversion of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) to sorbitol, establishing a cascade valorization strategy within an SCL biorefinery. Bifunctional Ru-based catalysts were prepared via different routes and comprehensively characterized. Ru/HCS, prepared by carbonization, sulfonation, and Ru loading, exhibited the highest catalytic activity. Its performance was evaluated at 160–240 °C, 2–10 h, 2–6 MPa H 2 , and 15–35 mL water. Under optimum conditions (220 °C, 6 h, 5 MPa H 2 , and 25 mL water), Ru/HCS achieved 72.3% sorbitol yield, 76.0% selectivity, and 95.7% MCC conversion. Quantitative correlation analysis revealed that sorbitol yield could not be adequately explained by bulk SO 3 H density or Ru content alone, indicating that catalytic performance is governed by multiple physicochemical factors. Catalyst stability was evaluated over five cycles. This co-product-to-catalyst approach enhances resource utilization by coupling levulinic acid production with cellulose upgrading, advancing integrated and circular lignocellulosic biorefineries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eom et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: