Case-control study reveals heterozygous MSH3 and MLH3 mutations elevate colorectal cancer risk through somatic second hits, highlighting novel drivers of mutational signature ID4.
Background MSH3 and MLH3 are non-canonical DNA mismatch repair genes, involved in repairing insertion-deletion mutations. Colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenomas have been reported in patients with bi-allelic germline MSH3 mutations, and in a very few bi-allelic MLH3 mutation carriers. Objectives We hypothesised that germline loss-of-function MSH3 and MLH3 mutations were akin to constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (cMMRd) and Lynch syndrome, such that CRC could result from either bi-allelic germline mutations or heterozygous germline mutations after second hits. Design About 12 000 CRC and multiple polyp cases and 460 000 controls were studied. 2023 patients underwent cancer genome sequencing. Results One CRC/multiple polyp case had bi-allelic MSH3 mutations and another, bi-allelic MLH3 mutations. MSH3 and MLH3 germline heterozygotes had an increased risk of CRC (2.2-fold, p = 6.6×10 −5 and 1.6-fold, p = 0.028, respectively), owing to somatic ‘second hits’ that inactivated the wildtype allele. Single second hits sometimes inactivated both MSH3 and the nearby APC gene. All CRCs with MSH3 or MLH3 deficiency were microsatellite-stable but hypermutant. Deletions of ≥2 bp were particularly increased (~12-fold) and signature ID4 was usually present (p < 0.0001). CRCs from heterozygotes without ‘second hits’ showed no hypermutation. Conclusion The phenotypes of bi-allelic MSH3 and MLH3 mutation carriers resemble some patients with cMMRd. Heterozygous germline MSH3 and MLH3 alleles have incomplete penetrance, but increase CRC risk via hypermutation, phenotypically resembling PMS2- mutant Lynch syndrome. A causal association with specific mutations has not previously been reported for ID4 in human tumours. ID4 probably does not have a single aetiology, but can result from MSH3 or MLH3 deficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soriano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: