Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis reveals category-specific oxidative stability across plant-based alternatives and meat products, highlighting that plant-based meats are not a homogeneous food group.
This study evaluated changes in physicochemical properties, oxidative stability, colour, and texture of commercially available plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) and their meat counterparts during consumer-relevant post-opening refrigerated storage. Four product categories (salami, bacon, kabanos sausages, and frankfurters), each represented by a plant-based alternative and its corresponding conventional meat product, were analysed immediately after package opening and after 7 days of refrigerated storage (4 ± 1 °C). Physicochemical parameters (pH, oxidation–reduction potential, water activity), colour, cutting force, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and ABTS radical-scavenging activity were determined. Frankfurters were additionally evaluated before and after heating. Storage-related quality changes depended primarily on product category rather than product origin. Plant-based salami and bacon showed substantially greater lipid oxidation than meat products, whereas kabanos sausages exhibited comparable oxidative stability. Plant-based kabanos maintained more stable colour and texture during storage, while frankfurters displayed formulation- and heating-dependent responses. Cluster analysis confirmed that quality characteristics were product-specific and did not consistently separate plant-based from meat products. PBMAs cannot be considered a homogeneous food category with respect to post-opening quality. Product-specific evaluation is therefore essential when assessing the dietetic value, storage stability, and practical suitability of PBMAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kęska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: