Life cycle assessment reveals manufacturing emissions of 293.8 kg CO2 eq/kWh in lead-acid battery production, indicating that circular recycling could reduce carbon footprints by 34%.
Battery waste and lead-acid battery production remain important environmental concerns in developing economies where fossil-intensive electricity systems, diesel backup generation, and informal recycling practices are common. This study quantifies life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from lead-acid battery manufacturing in Pakistan using primary 2024 industrial operational data from Treet Corporation, Lahore, and compares these results with a modeled prospective China 2025 circular-recycling benchmark developed from secondary literature and GREET-based inventory data. An attributional life cycle assessment framework was applied using 1 kWh of installed nominal battery capacity as the main functional unit, with lifetime delivered electricity used as a supplementary sensitivity normalization. The Pakistan facility consumed 250,000 kWh of electricity and 21,000 L of diesel per month, resulting in production-stage emissions of 176.3 t \(CO_2\) eq/month. The corresponding gate-to-gate production-stage carbon intensity was estimated at 293.8 kg \(CO_2\) eq/kWh of installed nominal battery capacity. Electricity accounted for 68.1% of production emissions, while diesel backup generation contributed 31.9%. The China case should therefore be interpreted as a modeled benchmark scenario rather than a parallel empirical facility-level case. Under this prospective circular-recycling scenario, total lifecycle emissions are estimated to be approximately 34% lower than the Pakistan linear baseline; however, this reduction represents a model-estimated potential mitigation outcome rather than an observed cross-country difference. The magnitude of reduction is sensitive to electricity-grid intensity, use-phase assumptions, recycling efficiency, and allocation method. The findings indicate that electricity carbon intensity, diesel dependence, recycling allocation assumptions, and end-of-life management structure are the dominant drivers of lead-acid battery lifecycle environmental performance. The study provides a facility-level carbon-accounting baseline for Pakistan and highlights the importance of electricity decarbonization and formal recycling systems in reducing lifecycle emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zafar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: