Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter retrospective cohort study reveals facial nerve infiltration and intraparotid nodal spread as key prognostic markers in salivary gland carcinoma, highlighting the need for refined staging.
OBJECTIVES: Major salivary gland carcinomas are rare malignancies with limited prognostic evidence. This study assessed survival outcomes, independent prognostic factors, intraparotid lymph node involvement, and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL) density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of 892 patients, classified per the 2022 WHO Classification, treated surgically at 21 Italian referral centers (2010-2023). RESULTS: Median follow-up 61.4 months. The cohort included 61.1% males, median age 59.0 years; parotid gland was the primary site in 90.4%. AdCC (28.4%) and MEC (27.2%) were most frequent; 63.8% at Stage I-II. Five-year OS, DSS, and RFS were 87.9% (95% CI 85.4-90.1%), 93.1% (91.0-94.8%), and 77.7% (74.6-80.4%). Histological facial nerve infiltration was the most robust independent prognostic factor across all endpoints (OS: HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.12-2.81; DSS: HR 2.49, 1.37-4.50; RFS: HR 2.22, 1.54-3.21). Age, lymphovascular invasion, and atypical mitoses were additional independent predictors. Among 688 parotid patients with intraparotid nodal data available, 29.2% had intraparotid metastasis; 60.7% lacked cervical involvement, with LN+/pN0 patients showing worse RFS than LN-negative patients (71.2% vs 85.3%; p = 0.002). In 285 patients with available sTIL assessment (32.0%), higher sTIL density predicted improved RFS (HR 0.51 per 10% increment, 95% CI 0.35-0.73; p < 0.001). UICC 9th edition restaging reclassified 27.3% of pN0 patients as node-positive, with significant survival stratification (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Histological facial nerve infiltration was the most consistently independent prognostic factor, supporting systematic pathological reporting. Current TNM N-staging may inadequately capture intraparotid lymph node involvement, and sTILs showed a continuous prognostic effect on RFS, supporting prospective biomarker validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: