Qualitative co-design study establishes a newborn screening implementation framework with multidisciplinary experts, highlighting a structured pathway to scale up testing in low-resource settings.
Newborn screening (NBS) in Pakistan remains limited by fragmented service delivery, uneven provincial capacity, and the absence of an implementation pathway that links policy intent to operational planning. This study aimed to co-design a provincial NBS implementation framework for Punjab. To do so, we used a sequential blended workshop model supported by visual planning methods. We conducted a qualitative, three-phase co-design process with 19 participants from laboratory medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics, public health, academia, and policy. Phase I consisted of pre-work and an online workshop to establish a shared knowledge base and identify implementation barriers and enablers. Phase II used an in-person, visually facilitated planning workshop to translate these findings into a provincial NBS implementation framework. Phase III involved a asynchronous email-based review to refine the framework and reach consensus. Content analysis from Phase I identified five implementation domains: physical and technical infrastructure, operational systems, clinical integration, workforce and engagement, and governance and policy. In Phase II, these domains were translated into a visual implementation framework that specified priorities, stakeholders, risks, enablers, and action areas for phased rollout. Congenital hypothyroidism was identified as the most feasible entry-point condition. The final framework positioned NBS not as a stand-alone pilot, but as a coordinated provincial system requiring governance, financing, referral pathways, quality assurance, and workforce development. This study contributes an implementation-oriented model for moving from fragmented NBS initiatives to a provincial implementation framework in a low- and middle-income setting. It also offers a practical foundation for broader national scale-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: