Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Process-tracing analysis demonstrates that sequenced institutional autonomy stabilizes post-conflict peace in Aceh and Mindanao, highlighting the necessity of synchronized governance reforms.
Territorial autonomy can stabilise post-conflict orders under specific institutional and territorial conditions. Conceptualising autonomy as uneven territorial reordering, this article identifies five determinants shaping whether autonomy reduces or reallocates violence: external guarantees, legal codification, demilitarisation, inclusive governance and fiscal redistribution. Through process tracing of Aceh and Mindanao, the article argues that autonomy stabilises peace when these domains are sequenced as mutually reinforcing mechanisms, but becomes fragile when implementation is asynchronous. By linking credible-commitment theory with institutional peacebuilding, the study explains how autonomy stabilises negotiated settlements and reorders authority, coercion, representation and resources.
Miyoko Taniguchi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: