Narrative review reveals digital workflows enhance accuracy in free fibula flap mandibular reconstruction, suggesting long-term functional and biological superiority remains unproven.
The free fibula flap (FFF) is a reference reconstructive option, particularly for extensive mandibular defects. This narrative review examines the evolution of implant–prosthetic rehabilitation from conventional free-hand reconstruction to prosthetically driven digital workflows. A structured, non-systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science included English-language publications from 1989 to May 2026. Early approaches were limited by anatomical discrepancies, unfavorable implant positioning, excessive prosthetic space, and difficult peri-implant maintenance. Surgical refinements, including double-barrel reconstruction and soft-tissue procedures, improved rehabilitative conditions in selected cases. Virtual surgical planning, CAD/CAM guides, patient-specific fixation, and guided implant placement subsequently enabled closer coordination of reconstruction, implant positioning, and prosthetic design, supporting immediate protocols such as Jaw-in-a-Day. However, the available evidence remains heterogeneous and predominantly retrospective. Although digital workflows may improve accuracy and operative efficiency, their superiority in terms of long-term biological, prosthetic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes has not been conclusively demonstrated. Emerging technologies, including augmented reality, robotics, artificial intelligence, and digital twins, remain largely preliminary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pellegrino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: