Simulation study reveals causal-unit misidentification in modeled human-AI interactions, highlighting the necessity of conservative relational audits.
Human-AI interactions are increasingly described as teams, ecosystems, co-evolving systems, or relational structures. This preliminary methods preprint asks when a relational macro-level is scientifically warranted rather than merely a convenient label or predictive summary of interaction history. It proposes a conservative audit workflow based on a declared realized relational substrate Q, implementation-level intervention on Q, micro-macro causal-consistency testing, comparison with alternative decompositions, and smallest supported causal-unit attribution. Synthetic negative and positive controls illustrate predictive-summary confounding and causal-unit misidentification. All quantitative evidence reported in v0.1 is synthetic; the framework has not yet been validated on real human-AI systems, and the current simulations were not preregistered before their first execution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alberto Manco (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: