Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case study reveals high engagement but heavy workload in engineering undergraduates completing a 3D-printed engine project, highlighting implementation tradeoffs.
Mechanical engineering students often encounter thermodynamics, dynamics, stress analysis, CAD, fabrication, testing, and communication separately. This study examines perceptions and implementation lessons from a scaffolded, artifact-centered 3D-printed engine project organized around a shared system in a one-credit second-year mechanical engineering laboratory. The project involved 25 students across two sections and included thermodynamic sizing, CAD assembly, slider-crank motion simulation, hand-calculation comparison, stress analysis, PLA fabrication, motor-driven testing, redesign, and poster communication. This single-cohort evaluation used pre-project and post-project self-report surveys with locally developed quantitative items and open-ended prompts; 23 students completed the pre-project survey and 25 completed the post-project survey. No direct learning assessment or research analysis of student artifacts was conducted, and no pre-project respondent reported prior or concurrent Thermodynamics enrollment. Post-project responses showed high engagement (24/25, 96.0%) and perceived learning benefit (21/25, 84.0%), whereas workload fit was less favorable, with 8/25 (32.0%) selecting categories 4 or 5 and 11/25 (44.0%) selecting categories 1 or 2. Open-ended responses described iteration, fabrication, testing, and redesign; implementation concerns included instructional clarity, resource access, workload, and analytical-to-testing alignment. Overall, the case provides guidance while limiting conclusions to student perceptions and implementation experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naser Haghbin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: