Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sequential mixed-methods study reveals that tourism legitimacy mediates gain-loss calculations in multi-ethnic communities, indicating collective values shape resident support for tourism.
While conventional studies portray residents as self-interested actors driven by cost-benefit calculations, this study argues that collective interests also shape resident support, drawing on evidence from Guizhou Province, a multi-ethnic region in southwest China renowned for its well-preserved minority cultures. Guided by Weber’s Theory of Formal and Substantive Rationality (WTFSR), we develop and validate an alternative model through three sequential studies. Study 1 used in-depth interviews with 45 residents to identify tourism legitimacy as a key construct and to establish a preliminary theoretical framework. Building on these insights, Study 2 developed and validated a contextualized tourism legitimacy scale through a two-round field survey (N = 888). Study 3 then tested the full model using a separate survey dataset (N = 969). The findings confirm that tourism legitimacy mediates the effect of gain-loss assessments on resident support. By integrating legitimacy as a substantive rationality construct, this study extends resident support theory beyond the dominant cost–benefit paradigm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: