Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates accurate target-level metric depth estimation in operational crane environments, highlighting potential improvements for heavy-machinery safety surveillance.
Estimating metric depth for safety-relevant targets from a top-view crane camera is challenging because monocular predictions are scale-ambiguous and target regions of interest (RoIs) mix returns from payloads, personnel, hoisting wires, and the ground. We present a target-focused pipeline in which a detector defines RoIs, a dense metric-depth map is predicted, and one representative depth is extracted per object. A DINOv2–DPT relative-depth network is fixed, while a multiscale adapter, DINO detection branch, and pixel-wise spatial affine calibration head are trained. Ground-truth bounding boxes restrict metric supervision to target-relevant regions but are not inputs to the calibration head. At evaluation, all depth methods use identical predicted RoIs, and a class-aware kernel-density estimation rule extracts representative depths. On 272 hardware-synchronized RGB–LiDAR frames from one operational 150-ton crane, the proposed method achieved a target-level RMSE of 0.564 m and a pixel-level inlier ratio of 0.966 for δ<1.25. One-to-one ground-truth matching yielded a 0.566 m target RMSE with detection precision/recall of 0.960/0.970. AdaBins obtained lower pixel-level MAE and RMSE, whereas the proposed method obtained lower target-level errors. These results demonstrate the feasibility of target-focused metric ranging under the evaluated operational crane conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: