Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study uncovers Level-2 visual perspective-taking deficits in schizophrenia unaffected by self-avatar identity, suggesting instruction cues fail to mitigate egocentric bias.
This study investigated whether individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) exhibit impairments in Level-2 visual perspective-taking (VPT)—the ability to understand how a scene appears from another’s viewpoint—and if using a self-represented avatar could mitigate these deficits. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 ( N = 63) used a digit inversion task to assess Level-2 VPT based on object appearance. Experiment 2 ( N = 62) used a round-table task to assess it based on spatial location. Participants with SZ and healthy controls (HC) performed both tasks under two conditions: using a ‘self-avatar’ and an ‘other-avatar’. Individuals with SZ demonstrated significant Level-2 VPT impairments in both experiments. Compared to HC, the SZ group showed significantly lower accuracy and a stronger egocentric bias, particularly in perspective-incongruent conditions. Critically, the self-avatar identity did not produce a selective performance benefit in the SZ group. The findings confirm pervasive Level-2 VPT deficits in schizophrenia across different task domains. The absence of a schizophrenia-specific self-avatar benefit suggests that an instruction-based self-avatar manipulation alone may be insufficient to selectively improve Level-2 VPT performance in schizophrenia. The cognitive mechanisms underlying this pattern remain to be established. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: