Validation study demonstrates reliable high- and low-rate data recovery in a dual-path structural monitoring system, indicating robust performance under network outages.
Reliable structural monitoring for smart buildings and construction sites requires more than sensor acquisition; it requires sensing and communication paths that remain traceable, recoverable, and compatible with platform-side data processing under heterogeneous field constraints. This study presents a dual-path IoT sensing and communication framework that deliberately separates high-data-rate vibration monitoring from low-data-rate inclination-status monitoring while maintaining common requirements for preservation of available time information, data-source identification, and backend interpretability. The smart-building path integrates an ADXL355 triaxial accelerometer, ESP32-S3, Power over Ethernet (PoE), and Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) for 200 Hz vibration acquisition, together with a second-order 10 Hz low-pass filter, 40-record batching, and a Flash LittleFS-based store-and-recovery mechanism that interleaves live and replayed records after reconnection. The construction-site path combines an SCL3300-D01 inclinometer with LoRaWAN, baseline-referenced relative-angle estimation, and a hysteresis state machine with distinct alarm and recovery thresholds. In a 24 h validation, four vibration nodes delivered all 69,120,000 expected records, and four forced-outage trials recovered all offline records while live transmission continued. Frequency-domain analysis confirmed attenuation of high-frequency components while retaining the dominant low-frequency response. The inclination path demonstrated quantifiable angle accuracy, correct alarm/recovery transitions, continuous LoRaWAN frame delivery over the observed interval, and correct backend decoding. The results show that path-specific communication design, combined with a common traceability concept, supports prototype functionality under the reported test conditions, not immediate construction-site deployment. Full 3D visual synchronization, BIM/GIS asset mapping, and digital-twin platform interfacing were not implemented and remain future development tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: