Simulation study demonstrates improved prediction accuracy under differential privacy across heterogeneous clinical sites, indicating the value of joint modality-aware privacy optimization.
Multimodal healthcare prediction can benefit from combining structured electronic health records, medical imaging, and acquisition-related metadata, but these modalities are often incompletely observed across patients and unevenly distributed across clinical sites. Federated learning provides a mechanism for collaborative model training without centralizing patient records, yet privacy-preserving federated optimization remains challenging when clients differ in modality availability, update reliability, and data distribution. This study develops MoPA-FL, a modality-aware differentially private federated learning framework for partially observed multimodal healthcare prediction. The framework integrates modality-specific encoders, gated missing-modality fusion, branch-wise differentially private update perturbation, and server-side parameter-group aggregation guided by modality support and update reliability. MoPA-FL was evaluated through controlled federated simulations using the COVID Data for Shared Learning dataset, preserving 4479 structured-record admissions while leveraging an imaging-linked subset of 1859 patients. Under non-IID federated settings, MoPA-FL achieved an AUROC of 0.872 and an AUPRC of 0.683, with higher performance than representative federated, multimodal federated, and privacy-preserving baselines in the evaluated setting. At the configured privacy-budget setting of \(ε =2\) , MoPA-FL achieved an AUROC of 0.847, compared with 0.801 for differentially private federated averaging. These budget values describe the operational accounting configuration; a privacy guarantee for the complete server-observed training transcript remains to be established. These findings suggest that privacy, modality incompleteness, and client heterogeneity should be addressed jointly in multimodal healthcare federated learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: